culture


culture


  • Both in person-to-person matters and societally, the closer to a painful truth you get, and especially to one that would be incompatible with a long-established status quo in which the other half has been comfortable, the more violent recoil from that challenge will be. However the challenged can, whether that be flexing of power/influence, breaking spirits, or taking distance, the more shut down from ever attempting to take matters there again they will try to render you.

    Most people live in morbid fear of these painful truths. And the oppressive response they live by. It’s one of the first transgressions children inflict upon each other as they move into the social realm. And we don’t stop. Becomes one of the hallmarks of human teenage years, as we’re grow into figuring out how to navigate the space of Other People. And, of course, we continue into adulthood. We don’t want a conversation. All communication and social interaction is purely for validation.

    Likelihood of this reaction and retribution renders direct confrontation often ineffective or even counter-productive. The way forward is an assault of subtlety. Nudges. Planting a seed in another and nursing it until the other develops enough fondness for the seedling to take over its care.


    What is there to say conservatively that’s more important than working to bolster the existing system? Nothing, until there is enough resistance to incentivize creation of propaganda. Art, where new ideas are explored and old ideas challenged, has always matched liberalism’s idea-openness, and therefore, naturally leaned liberal where there’s been freedom to. And unsurprisingly, because it often addresses painful truths, has faced censure and silencing, sometimes violent and most often by authority. But also from the mob. Even these days; conservatives are busy right now banning books in Florida and Texas.

    So art, and importantly by extension entertainment, has historically collectively worked to plant the seeds of progressive and potentially counter-cultural ideas subtly in the public’s collective garden of thought. Entertainment is the common man’s gateway to that garden. Different enough from the system to speak more deeply to us than anything in the system can, but also subtle enough to not generate a repulsive reaction, contributing to slow cultural change over generations.

    Art and entertainment is imperative to the steady march of social progress. Unhappy with the world, that’s where I decided, decades ago now, to focus my life’s work, at the expense of all else (including myself), if need be. More specifically, I chose to focus my efforts upon bridging the gap between the art and entertainment I prefer, and the ideas therein that point toward a better world, that don’t move the broader social needle as much as they could, only winning praise within appreciative niches, and the common man, variably open to new ideas but more regularly than not aggressively resistant to change.


  • We are each a tiny piece of the supremely complex machine of existence, most of which is likely to remain a mystery to us for the foreseeable future. And so, from our extremely limited perspectives within this massively complicated matrix of mysteries and the push-pull of unknown factors beyond our comprehension, our lives are destined to feel in relative chaos lest we take shelter in some protective bubble. Often I have found that the bubbles provided out-of-the-box of our birth are unfortunately (from the perspective of my current bubble at least) composed largely of illusion and delusion that frame this chaotic perspective as something else more mentally manageable. As something that feels agreeable by way of generations of social initiation, nostalgia, and other particularly emotional rather than logical connections. But even those committed to a life lived boldly true must shore themselves up within some bubble of “as far as I know” sense or risk becoming a lone, vulnerable leaf torn apart by the violent winds of “chaos,” which again, is not actually chaos but some conglomeration of factors too big for us to even get full visage of, let alone control.

    So, come right this way. We have many models of mental shelters and bubbles available. Some like glass or clear plastic: weak but with a clear view of the outside. Some like brick or metal: much stronger, but offering zero perspective of anything but the minutia of the inhabitant’s small world. We could install a window or two for the latter if an Allegory-of-the-Cave-kinda experience is what you’re after. Most of us exist on a spectrum between these two extremes (generally closer to the latter), so we’ve likely seen others in their bubble from our own (and judged them and their bubble, of course). We’ve seen the soap bubble occupier in a perpetual state of being either confused or completely lost as they move from one volatile circumstance to another whenever their latest temporary bubble breaks like so many before under the teensiest pressures of reality. And we’ve seen the iron bubble occupier, so preoccupied with their own inane life and rules that they’re completely oblivious to anything outside that context. So… made up your mind? No pun intended. Keep in mind: there’s no warranties. Our bubbles burst too regularly for that, but we have many, many suitable replacements ready (even of the lemons that are guaranteed to break from the sneeze of only one of God’s nostrils). And we’re always coming up with new bubbles to try out when the old ones our ancestors used don’t work so well no more. Also, it’s not that big of a deal, but before you make your final decision, keep in mind that many throughout history have died for their choice of bubble.

    Kidding aside, I believe shoring oneself up to thrive as well as one can despite any eventualities that could arise in the relative chaos of ours lives is paramount to both living a life worth the limited energy we’re allotted at birth and surviving it true of heart within a bubble of composed of as little illusion and/or delusion as possible. Which means… at the very least… looking at the most significant things in our lives (actions, histories, routines, habits, people, places, values, et al.) from as many perspectives as possible. Both from in and out of our current value system. In the full, fantastical scope of possibilities: past, present, and future. If this happens; or this; or you do this; or this comes out of nowhere. From the perspective of a life subjectively better; and worse; and just different. From the perspective of others both close and intimate to us and far and away.

    Though we likely cannot, and maybe will never, see the absolute truth, the broader the scope of introspection, the more we can assure ourselves we are moving towards it simply because we are moving ever away from falsehoods.

    This doesn’t mean worrying. Rather, it means, when the circumstances of life change for whatever reason–and they will in all but the most socially protected of bubbles–one has already dealt with and processed all the possibilities and their negative effects. So this process of broad and deep introspection frees one of worry, at least as far as we can humanly achieve. Because there’s nothing we humans fear more than the unknown. Even if we are enticed toward something completely opposite of who we are for whatever reason, change generally happens over time in steps. Seen in captures of skipped time, how one has moved from one place to another might often be shocking. (This is basis of much art and entertainment.) But over the normal, moment-to-moment passage of time, even the most grand of changes is unnoticed for how incremental it is. This is true of both individuals and organizations, from families to nations to humanity as a whole.

    Those necessary alternate perspectives, which collectively generate wisdom that can persist outside of our individual bubbles, can be shared/taught, as they are through a good book or movie, but even the most comprehensive work will always pale in comparison to the full, uncontextualized experience of life lived oneself. Especially that of life lived with a mindset of broad introspection. But even so, we are creatures bound by the here-and-now, so that which we share socially (via whatever language or medium), allowing access to perspectives otherwise difficult or impossible to experience (albeit with the understanding they will all be to varying levels of limited and biased) is just as vitally important as getting out there and living ourselves.

    And it’s important to know experience alone isn’t wisdom. Just because we learned something from an event (whether it be conscious, as in a statement we can tell ourselves, or unconscious, as in an instinctive reaction) doesn’t mean we learned something worthwhile that we should pass on as wisdom. In fact, funnily enough because of our regular lack of introspective preparation, we very often learn the opposite of what’s worthwhile by sudden force of need, developing unhealthy coping mechanisms, going on to socially distribute disinformation based on limited perspective, and so on. We shouldn’t consider an event fully understood, and act/live upon it, until we’ve looked at it through through a test of more broadly-evaluated introspection.

    If you do such broad and deep introspection enough, it inevitably becomes an important part of your personality due to how powerful it is as a habit. But learning to be comfortable in the state of virtuous uncertainty that comes with in a world largely incompatible with any form of doubt–by nature of our cultures being designed principally by those who have ruled from extremely dense, blind, and protected bubbles–is an even more difficult skill. Most will simply choose to live out their life in the most comfortable bubble near to that of the bubbles they spent considerable time in and around in their youth, and that’s that.